Everyone who reports gets things wrong sometimes. What separates a trustworthy publication from an untrustworthy one is what it does next. Techiadd corrects its mistakes promptly, openly and without defensiveness. We would rather admit an error and fix it than pretend it never happened.
Report an error
If you spot a factual mistake in anything we have published — a wrong price, an incorrect specification, a misstated date, a misquote — please tell us. Email corrections@techiadd.com with the article’s title or link and, if you can, the specific error and a source we can check. We read every message and we treat them as a help, not a nuisance.
How we decide what to correct
We correct genuine errors of fact. That includes wrong numbers, wrong names, incorrect technical details and anything that misrepresents what happened. We also update articles when a product receives a significant change — a firmware fix, a price cut, a recall — that affects our original assessment. Differences of opinion and interpretation are not errors, though we are always willing to hear that our analysis was unfair.
How we mark corrections
Transparency is the point, so we do not edit mistakes away silently. Our approach depends on how significant the change is:
- Significant corrections — where an error affected the substance or the conclusion of an article — are noted at the foot of the piece, stating what was wrong and what it now says, with the date.
- Minor fixes — a typo, a broken link, a small clarification that does not change the meaning — are made directly, and we still add a brief note where the change could matter to a reader who saw the earlier version.
- Updates to developing stories are timestamped so you can see what was known when.
We do not unpublish a story to make an error disappear. In the rare case where an entire article is fundamentally flawed, we will say so plainly rather than delete the evidence.
Who is responsible
Corrections are overseen by the relevant section editor and, for anything significant, by the Editor-in-Chief, Marcus Chen. The same standards apply whatever the source of the error — a reporting slip, a supplier’s bad data, or a mistake that a reader caught before we did.
Why we do it this way
A public corrections record is a feature, not an embarrassment. It tells you that when we are right, we mean it — and that when we are wrong, you will be the first to know. That is part of how we earn the trust set out in our Editorial Guidelines.